This website is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by any individual or organization and exists solely for critical commentary on public statements.
This website exists to document and critically examine public statements that express authoritarian, exclusionary, or hateful ideology.
The goal is commentary and critique, not harassment, impersonation, or defamation.
All quoted material is presented solely for purposes of criticism, commentary, and public interest discussion.
Short excerpts are used under fair use principles.
Opinions expressed here are opinions, not statements of fact.
Sources are cited where publicly available.
Names are omitted from excerpts. This site critiques public statements, not private individuals.
Public speech has consequences. When individuals choose to publish political or ideological statements in public forums, those statements may be examined, quoted, and criticized.
This site focuses on:
Each excerpt is presented verbatim, with context and analysis.
"sorry I didn't know you are gay"
— Public statement, January 2026
Commentary: This statement appears to deploy sexual orientation as a pejorative. The rhetorical structure suggests that being gay is grounds for dismissal. This pattern is consistent with what researchers term casual homophobia—language that treats LGBTQ+ identity as inherently negative.
"Why don't you fucking go there, fight for the wrong, commit a fucking felony, and get shot in your fucking face"
— Public statement, January 2026
Commentary: This statement invokes the recipient's death as a rhetorical outcome of political disagreement. In my view, language of this kind functions as intimidation rather than argument. It reflects a pattern where dissent is met with imagined violence.
History shows that harmful movements do not begin with uniforms or coups. They begin with words.
Documenting rhetoric is not censorship. It is accountability.
This is critical commentary on public speech.
If any excerpt is inaccurate or lacks relevant context, corrections may be submitted. Submissions must include:
Good-faith corrections will be reviewed.
Silence is a choice.
Documentation is another.
This site chooses documentation.